By Stacker
- Hosting 2026 World Cup could cost U.S. cities upwards of $250M
- A country that wins the World Cup tournament tends to experience a slight but noticeable increase in GDP growth, around 0.48 percentage points
The World Cup is among the most anticipated and awaited events, cherished by football fans worldwide. Held once every four years, it’s more than just a sporting competition; it’s a worldwide celebration that captures the attention of millions. Given its scale and significance, it’s no surprise that the World Cup has far-reaching effects beyond the pitch. From tourism and infrastructure spending to advertising and retail sales, the tournament plays a major role in shaping global and local economies. Plus500 explores the effects of the World Cup on global economic trends.
World Cup participants
Before the main event, a multiyear qualification process determines which nations earn a spot in the final tournament. Previously, 32 teams participated in the month-long competition hosted by one or more countries, with the host nation automatically securing a place in the lineup. However, from 2026 onward, the tournament is set to expand to 48 participating teams, allowing more countries to compete on the world stage.
Why is the World Cup important?
Hosting 2026 World Cup to cost U.S. cities upwards of $250 million. Beyond the sport, the World Cup promotes positive global initiatives such as education, health awareness, and social inclusion through collaborations with international bodies like UNESCO and the World Health Organization. It also offers a unique opportunity to celebrate cultural diversity and showcase elite football talent globally.
Economic costs and investments in hosting the World Cup
Over the years, hosting the FIFA World Cup has become an increasingly expensive endeavor. Countries have poured billions into infrastructure, stadiums, and preparation efforts. For example, Qatar spent about $200 billion when it hosted the 2022 tournament, while Russia spent around $16 billion in 2018, Brazil $19.7 billion in 2014, and South Africa approximately $7.2 billion in 2010.
Short-term economic benefits
In the short term, host countries often experience a boost in economic activity. The 1994 World Cup in the United States is a notable example, with Los Angeles alone generating $623 million. Other host cities, such as New York, Boston, and San Francisco, collectively saw over $1 billion in economic gains. Hotel revenues increased by 10%, while food and beverage sales rose by 15% compared to the previous year.
Similarly, Germany’s 2006 tournament generated about 2.2 billion euros in revenue. This figure was mainly driven by tourism and ticket sales. The tournament also spurred major infrastructure and public transportation investments, contributing to urban renewal and enhancing Germany’s international reputation.
Long-term and indirect economic effects
Beyond immediate returns, the World Cup can leave a lasting legacy. After hosting in 1994, the United States launched Major League Soccer in 1996, boosting interest in the sport domestically and stimulating growth in associated markets such as youth leagues and sports merchandise.
The 2006 tournament catalyzed long-term urban development in Germany, particularly in cities like Berlin and Munich. Improvements in transport and tourism infrastructure continued to benefit the country years after the final match, helping to elevate its profile as a global travel and business destination.
Economic risks and challenges
Despite the potential upsides, hosting the World Cup can also bring significant challenges. Brazil’s 2014 tournament, which cost around $15 billion, faced criticism due to the underuse of several stadiums after the event and concerns about social displacement and inequality.
Impact on national GDP
A nation’s economic performance may be affected by winning the World Cup. Studies indicate that a country that wins the tournament tends to experience a slight but noticeable increase in GDP growth, around 0.48 percentage points, in the two quarters following the victory. This is often attributed to greater global exposure, increased consumer confidence, and stronger export performance.
CBX Vibe: “Waka Waka (estos in Africa)” Shakira
